District Report Card 2010
|
 Download to PDF |
Font Size : 
()
Indicator 1
Percent Tested Overall |
Percent Below Basic |
Percent Basic |
Percent Proficient |
Percent Advanced |
Percent Proficient and Above |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade Three Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 71.2 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy: | ||||||
| Grade Three Mathematics | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 70 | ||||||
| Grade Four Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 71.2 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy: | ||||||
| Grade Four Mathematics | Annual Measurable Objective : 70 | |||||
| Grade Five Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 71.2 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy: | ||||||
| Grade Five Mathematics | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 70 | ||||||
| Grade Five Science | ||||||
| Grade Six Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 67.6 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy: | ||||||
| Grade Six Mathematics | Annual Measurable Objective : 64.55 | |||||
| Grade Seven Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 67.6 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy | ||||||
| Grade Seven Mathematics | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 64.55 | ||||||
| Grade Seven Science | ||||||
| Grade Eight Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 67.6 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy: | ||||||
| Grade Eight Mathematics | Annual Measurable Objective : 64.55 | |||||
| EOC Algebra 1 | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 64.6 | ||||||
| EOC Geometry | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 64.6 | ||||||
| Grade 11 Literacy | ||||||
| Annual Measurable Objective : 67.75 | ||||||
| Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed in Literacy: | ||||||
| Biology | ||||||
| Total Number of Recently Arrived LEP Students Not Assessed for All Literacy Grades: | ||||||
Norm Referenced Test (SAT10)
| Grade One Reading Comprehension | NA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Grade One Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | NA |
|
| Grade Two Reading Comprehension | NA |
|
| Grade Two Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | NA |
|
| Grade Three Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Three Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | ||
| Grade Four Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Four Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | ||
| Grade Five Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Five Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | ||
| Grade Five Science | ||
| Grade Six Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Six Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | ||
| Grade Seven Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Seven Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | ||
| Grade Seven Science | ||
| Grade Eight Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Eight Math Problem Solving and Data Interpretation | ||
| Grade Nine Reading Comprehension | ||
| Grade Nine Math Concepts and Problem Solving | ||
| ACT | ||
| Number of Students in College Preparatory Enrichment Program (CPEP) | 0 |
|
| Mathematics | ||
| Science | ||
| English | ||
| Composite | ||
| Reading | ||
| Advanced Placement Courses (AP) | ||
| Number of Students Taking AP Courses | 0 |
|
| Number of AP Exams Taken | 0 |
|
| Number of Exams Scored 3, 4, or 5 | 0 |
|
Improvement School Rating (Gains)
| 1-Schools in Need of Immediate Improvement | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2-Schools Approaching Standards (Alert) | ||
| 3-Schools Meeting Improvement Standards | ||
| 4-Schools Exceeding Improvement Standards | ||
| 5-Schools of Excellence for Improvement |
Performance School Rating (Status)
| 1-Schools in Need of Immediate Improvement | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2-Schools on Alert | ||
| 3-Schools Meeting Standards | ||
| 4-Schools Exceeding Standards | ||
| 5-Schools of Excellence |
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
| Met Adequate Yearly Progress | ||
|---|---|---|
| First Year Not to Meet Standards (Alert) | ||
| Year One of Targeted School Improvement | ||
| Year Two of Targeted School Improvement | ||
| Targeted Corrective Action | ||
| Targeted Intensive School Improvement | ||
| Targeted Restructuring | ||
| Year One of Whole School Improvement | ||
| Year Two of Whole School Improvement | ||
| Whole School Corrective Action | ||
| Whole School Intensive Improvement | ||
| Whole School Intensive Restructuring | ||
| State Directed |
Indicator 2: Access
Annual Accreditation Status
| Accredited |
N |
|
|---|---|---|
| Accredited-Cited |
N |
|
| Accredited-Probationary |
N |
|
| Attendance Rate | % |
|
| Dropout Rate | % |
|
Graduation Rate [Revised 1-20-2012] [+]
Data Source: ADE Office of Research & Technology |
||
| Combined Population Graduation Rate | ||
| African American Graduation Rate | ||
| Hispanic Graduation Rate | ||
| Caucasian Graduation Rate | ||
| Economically Disadvantaged Graduation Rate | ||
| Limited English Proficient Graduation Rate | ||
| Students with a Disability Graduation Rate | ||
| Grade Inflation Rate [+] | % |
|
| Remediation Rate | % |
|
| October 1 Enrollment | 0 |
|
| District Provides Textbooks for All Pupils | ||
Indicator 3: Retention
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 1 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 1 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 2 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 2 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 3 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 3 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 4 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 4 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 5 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 5 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 6 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 6 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 7 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 7 | ||
| Number of Students Retained at Grade 8 | ||
| Percent of Students Retained at Grade 8 |
Indicator 4 : Discipline
| Discipline Policies Distributed to Parents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Discipline Training Provided to Staff | ||
| Parental Involvement Plan Adopted | ||
| Expulsions | % |
|
| Weapons Incidents | % |
|
| Staff Assaults |
% |
|
| Student Assaults | % |
|
| Alternative Learning Environment Compliance Status |
Indicator 5: Demographics
| Percent of Teachers Completely Certified (Licensed) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Percent Teaching with Emergency/ Provisional Credentials | ||
| Percent of Teachers with Bachelor's Degree | ||
| Percent of Teachers with Master's Degree | ||
| Percent of Teachers with Advanced Degree | ||
| Teachers in High Poverty Schools | ||
| Percent of Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers | ||
| Teachers in Low Poverty Schools | ||
| Percent of Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers | ||
| Aggregate All Economic Levels | ||
| Percent of Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers | ||
| School Board Member Training* | ||
Indicator 6: Choice
| Percent of Students Obtained Through School Choice |
|---|
Indicator 7: Economic
| District Total Mills Voted | ||
|---|---|---|
| District Expenditure Per Student | $0 |
|
| District Average Teacher Salary | $0 |
|
| District Total Expenditures | $0 |
|
| District Instructional Expenditures | $0 |
|
| District Administrative Expenditures | $0 |
|
| District Extracurricular Expenditures | $0 |
|
| District Capital Expenditures | $0 |
|
| District Debt Service Expenditures | $0 |
|
| Percent of Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Meals | ||
| State Free and Reduced-Price Meal Rate ** | 58.2% |
|
| National Free and Reduced-Price Meal Rate ** | 51.2% |